<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Single-Serving Photo &#187; regulations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://singleservingphoto.com/tag/regulations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://singleservingphoto.com</link>
	<description>Photography in Small Doses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:58:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DOT to Photographers: You&#8217;re Grounded!</title>
		<link>http://singleservingphoto.com/2008/01/02/faa-to-photographers-youre-grounded/</link>
		<comments>http://singleservingphoto.com/2008/01/02/faa-to-photographers-youre-grounded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 04:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.singleservingphoto.com/2008/01/02/faa-to-photographers-adfadf/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Transportation&#8217;s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, or PHMSA (I like to say it &#8220;pa-hum-sah&#8221; just to be a jerk), dropped a bomb on us recently with a new set of regulations governing lithium-based batteries in public transportation (chiefly air travel, but presumably any transportation system under the DOT&#8217;s oversight). Of concern [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://singleservingphoto.com/2008/01/02/faa-to-photographers-youre-grounded/' addthis:title='DOT to Photographers: You&#8217;re Grounded! '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The Department of Transportation&#8217;s <em>Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration</em>, or <span class="caps">PHMSA</span> (I like to say it &#8220;pa-hum-sah&#8221; just to be a jerk), dropped a bomb on us recently with a new set of regulations governing lithium-based batteries in public transportation (chiefly air travel, but presumably any transportation system under the <span class="caps">DOT</span>&#8217;s oversight).</p>

	<p>Of concern are so-called <em>primary lithium</em> or <em>lithium metal</em> batteries as well as the somewhat more common <em>lithium ion</em> batteries so familiar to photographers. The regulations basically <strong>prohibit</strong> loose spare batteries in checked baggage and also place a number of other restrictions on the number and variety of batteries that can be kept in carry-on luggage.</p>

	<p>I became concerned because I will be flying out to the California coast at the end of February to scout locations for future <a href="http://www.artphotoworkshops.com">art photography workshops</a> and making that voyage across the country is enough of a hassle without <span class="caps">TSA</span> inspectors throwing all of my batteries away.</p>

	<p>Here I will make a valiant effort to summarize what has already been said by others and tell you why I think this &#8220;emergency&#8221; might be somewhat blown out of proportion. Continue after the jump!<span id="more-163"></span></p>

	<h2>The Facts</h2>

	<p>Before I get into the details of this new set of rules, you should probably know what the rules actually say. So, for your convenience, here is the actual <span class="caps">DOT</span> <span class="caps">PHMSA</span> press release in full:</p>

	<p><blockquote></p>

	<p>Friday, December 28, 2007</p>

	<p>Contact: Patricia Klinger or Joe Delcambre<br />
Tel.: (202) 366-4831</p>

	<p>New US <span class="caps">DOT</span> Hazmat Safety Rule to Place Lithium Battery Limits in Carry-on Baggage on Passenger Aircraft Effective January 1, 2008</p>

	<p>Passengers will no longer be able to pack loose lithium batteries in checked luggage beginning January 1, 2008 once new federal safety rules take effect.  The new regulation, designed to reduce the risk of lithium battery fires, will continue to allow lithium batteries in checked baggage if they are installed in electronic devices, or in carry-on baggage if stored in plastic bags.</p>

	<p>Common consumer electronics such as travel cameras, cell phones, and most laptop computers are still allowed in carry-on and checked luggage.  However, the rule limits individuals to bringing only two extended-life spare rechargeable lithium batteries (see attached illustration), such as laptop and professional audio/video/camera equipment lithium batteries in carry-on baggage.</p>

	<p>&#8220;Doing something as simple as keeping a spare battery in its original retail packaging or a plastic zip-lock bag will prevent unintentional short-circuiting and fires,&#8221; said Krista Edwards, Deputy Administrator of the U.S. Department of Transportation&#8217;s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.</p>

	<p>Lithium batteries are considered hazardous materials because they can overheat and ignite in certain conditions.  Safety testing conducted by the <span class="caps">FAA</span> found that current aircraft cargo fire suppression system would not be capable of suppressing a fire if a shipment of non-rechargeable lithium batteries were ignited in flight.</p>

	<p>&#8220;This rule protects the passenger,&#8221; said Lynne Osmus, Federal Aviation Administration (<span class="caps">FAA</span>) assistant administrator for security and hazardous materials.  &#8220;It&#8217;s one more step for safety.  It&#8217;s the right thing to do and the right time to do it.&#8221;</p>

	<p>In addition to the new rule, <span class="caps">PHMSA</span> is working with the <span class="caps">FAA</span>, the National Transportation Safety Board, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the battery and airline industries, airline employee organizations, testing laboratories, and the emergency response communities to increase public awareness about battery-related risks and developments. These useful safety tips are highlighted at the public website: http://safetravel.dot.gov.</blockquote></p>

	<p>For the <strong>extremely intrepid</strong>, you may read the <a href="http://www.labsafety.com/refinfo/fedreg/FRPDF/080907.pdf">actual final rule</a> on labsafety.com. It&#8217;s 22 pages long, so get a cup of coffee.</p>

	<p>On the Safe Travel website (which is an arm of the <span class="caps">DOT</span> and <span class="caps">PHMSA</span>), more specific guidelines are provided than what was in the press release. Feel free to <a href="http://safetravel.dot.gov/whats_new_batteries.html">read Safe Travel&#8217;s synopsis</a> as well if you like. It&#8217;s not too long.</p>

	<p>For the record, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever seen a <em>primary lithium</em> battery before. All of my lithium-based batteries are <em>lithium ion</em>, which are much less volatile and are subject to slightly different rules. I will presume that we&#8217;re only talking about lithium ion batteries from here on out.</p>

	<h2>The Concerns</h2>

	<p>The danger of having lithium batteries floating around in luggage is twofold. First, there is some concern about batteries getting shorted out and causing fires in the cargo hold where fire suppression is mechanized and not as effective as people in the cabin area with fire extinguishers. Second, if a lithium battery were to catch fire by some means, it is possible that it could explode. So you can imagine the <span class="caps">DOT</span>&#8217;s concerns.</p>

	<p>Safe Travel&#8217;s release about these new rules is fairly specific about what sorts of batteries you can&#8217;t bring on the plane, but rather than parroting their website, I&#8217;ll break it down into the important bits.</p>

	<h2>The Rules</h2>

	<ul>
		<li>You really shouldn&#8217;t pack your spare batteries in your checked luggage because the <span class="caps">TSA</span> inspectors have the right (and yes, the responsibility) to remove them and throw them away if they believe them to be a safety hazard. At between $25 and $50 per battery, why take the risk?</li>
		<li>These new rules do not set any quantity limitations on batteries containing fewer than eight &#8220;equivalent grams&#8221; of lithium. Basically, all of your batteries are likely to be excluded from this rule. I will get into the specifics below.</li>
		<li>Batteries that are not lithium-based are definitely excluded from these rules. Make certain that you are aware of what your batteries are made out of. For example, the Canon <span class="caps">EOS</span>-1d, 1ds, 1d Mark II, and 1ds Mark II use nickel metal hydride (NiMH) batteries, so take as many as you want.</li>
	</ul>

	<h2>Let&#8217;s Do Some Math</h2>

	<p>What on Earth is eight equivalent grams of lithium? Well, the <span class="caps">DOT</span> says that eight equivalent grams of lithium are present in a battery with approximately 100 watt-hours (wh) of power. So, how much is that?</p>

	<p>We can figure it out pretty easily. A standard Canon BP-511A battery (used by all Canon <em>prosumer</em> cameras such as the Rebel, 10D, 20D, 30D, 40D, 5D, and on, and on) is rated at 1,390 milliamp-hours (mAh), which means that if you pulled one milliamp of current out of the battery per hour, it would last for 1,390 hours. Another way to say it is that if you pulled 1,390 milliamps of current out of the battery, it would last for one hour.</p>

	<p>We can convert 1,390 milliamps to watts by assuming a time period of one hour. Ahem, here is a formula:</p>

	<p>W = V &times; A</p>

	<p>Watts is equal to volts multiplied by amps. This battery is 7.4 volts and we&#8217;ll say it&#8217;s pushing 1,390 milliamps, or 1.39 amps.</p>

	<p>W = 7.4V &times; 1.39A<br />
W = 10.286VA</p>

	<p>Because we assumed a time unit of one hour, we can say that this battery has a power rating of roughly 10wh (10 watts &times; 1 hour). Making any sense?</p>

	<p>Clearly 10wh is far below the 100wh rating necessary to reach eight equivalent grams of lithium, so it&#8217;s safe to say that our little BP-511A battery is pretty far away from being subject to these new rules. It&#8217;s really important to note that the <span class="caps">DOT</span> doesn&#8217;t care how many batteries you have that contain fewer than eight equivalent grams of lithium, nor do they care how much aggregate lithium there is in your carry-on. The concern is only for batteries with eight or more equivalent grams <em>each</em>.</p>

	<h2>Taking Precautions</h2>

	<p>Just because you&#8217;re a whiz kid with a calculator and you are functionally literate doesn&#8217;t mean that the <span class="caps">TSA</span> folks won&#8217;t hassle you if they feel like you aren&#8217;t being safe. So, to prevent unnecessary headaches, the Safe Travel website recommends the following important procedures:</p>

	<ul>
		<li>Pack spare batteries in carry-on baggage. In the passenger compartment, flight crews can better monitor safety conditions to prevent an incident, and can access fire extinguishers, if an incident does happen.</li>
		<li>For loose batteries, place tape across the battery&#8217;s contacts to isolate terminals. Isolating terminals prevents short-circuiting.</li>
		<li>If original packaging is not available, effectively insulate battery terminals by isolating spare batteries from contact with other batteries and metal. Place each battery in its own protective case, plastic bag, or package. Do not permit a loose battery to come in contact with metal objects, such as coins, keys, or jewelry.</li>
	</ul>

	<p>The first one echoes my intuition about keeping expensive batteries close as hand if possible, to keep an eye on them. The second and third points are of interest to me because I normally pack a couple of Canon-brand BP-511As as well as a handful of cheaper, third-party BP-511A lookalikes, which do not come with the handy plastic covers that would satisfy those suggestions.</p>

	<p>Fortunately, there is a Yahoo! store called <a href="http://www.greenbatteries.com/repbatforcan1.html">Green Batteries</a> that is selling those little doodads for $1.77 (or four for about $5.50, which is about $1.40 each). I plan to pick up a bunch of those and make sure all of my batteries are properly insulated from external contact.</p>

	<p>I travel with a Tamrac CyberPack, which has individual battery pockets in the outer compartment, but when it comes to <span class="caps">TSA</span> inspectors, I always give them the benefit of the doubt. For $10, it&#8217;s just peace of mind.</p>

	<p>If any of you good folks fly with your gear in the coming months, please do write me with your experiences, positive or negative. Leave a comment on this post, or just drop me an email (aaron at singleservingphoto dot com), I&#8217;d love to hear from you.</p>

<blockquote></blockquote>

<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://singleservingphoto.com/2008/01/02/faa-to-photographers-youre-grounded/' addthis:title='DOT to Photographers: You&#8217;re Grounded! '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://singleservingphoto.com/2008/01/02/faa-to-photographers-youre-grounded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protecting Our National Parks: One Photographer&#8217;s Story</title>
		<link>http://singleservingphoto.com/2007/10/16/protecting-our-national-parks-one-photographers-story/</link>
		<comments>http://singleservingphoto.com/2007/10/16/protecting-our-national-parks-one-photographers-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.singleservingphoto.com/2007/10/16/protecting-our-national-parks-one-photographers-story/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because we, as photographers, so often use nature and the natural environment around us as subject matter in our work, it behooves us to try our best to preserve it. It&#8217;s very important when photographing in nature that we recognize our impact on the environment and do our best to minimize it. In the Great [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://singleservingphoto.com/2007/10/16/protecting-our-national-parks-one-photographers-story/' addthis:title='Protecting Our National Parks: One Photographer&#8217;s Story '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Because we, as photographers, so often use nature and the natural environment around us as subject matter in our work, it behooves us to try our best to preserve it. It&#8217;s very important when photographing in nature that we recognize our impact on the environment and do our best to minimize it.</p>

	<p>In the Great Smoky Mountains this past week, I got a very personal introduction to one way our photography can greatly disturb the environment and so today I will talk about it.</p>

	<p><a href="http://blogactionday.org"><img src="http://blogactionday.org/images/action_468x60.jpg" /></a></p>

	<p>This is my contribution to Blog Action Day, joining 15,000 fellow bloggers in raising awareness of environmental issues. (Yes, I know it was yesterday. Better late than never!)<span id="more-149"></span></p>

	<p>National parks are truly environmental treasures. Not only does the National Park Service protect the land, geology, and flora of the parks, but it also studies and assists the indigenous creatures that live in each of its nearly 400 sites. Because these locations are more readily accessible and better documented than the untamed wilderness (of which there is very little remaining in America), and because they were preserved for their unique beauty and significance in the culture and history of this country, they are obvious destinations for outdoors photographers.</p>

	<p>While photographing in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, which straddles the line between Tennessee and North Carolina, I was made forcefully aware of some of the dangers these parks face and how important it is that we contribute to their protection.</p>

	<h2>Painting the Night</h2>

	<p>&#8220;Light painting,&#8221; or using flashlights to illuminate objects during long exposures in the dark, is one of the staples of outdoor photography, and I think it&#8217;s a fairly common practice; you&#8217;ll see it used by <a href="http://www.thenocturnes.com">The Nocturnes</a> and others who are into making images after dark. Having used the technique to to great effect in Death Valley and in Yosemite, it went without saying that my colleague Chris and I would find such opportunities in the Smokies.</p>

	<p>Our plan was to enter Cades Cove after dark and scout out a location. Ideally, we wanted to hike down to the Primitive Baptist Church, which is 2.4 miles each way from the public parking lot. You can&#8217;t drive down the road because the gates leading into the Cades Cove loop are locked at sunset. After walking for some time, we decided to stop and set up along a barbed wire fence and get a feel for the night. The fence stood between the narrow road and a large field with a solitary tree standing a few hundred feet away. It seemed a good enough spot with a lot of visible sky, so we set up our gear.</p>

	<p>$image:right/SingleServings/2007/October/11Oct07-01.jpg$</p>

	<p>My composition placed the faraway tree front-and-center with the barbed wire fence in the foreground, which I thought would give a nice sense of depth to the image. After exposing for twenty minutes, occasionally yelling out &#8220;Hey bear!&#8221; to make sure any of the 1,600 black bears in the park would know we were there<sup><a href="http://singleservingphoto.com/2007/10/16/protecting-our-national-parks-one-photographers-story/#footnote_0_149" id="identifier_0_149" class="footnote-link footnote-identifier-link" title="Black bears don&amp;#8217;t want trouble, but they just hate surprises.">1</a></sup>, we painted the fence with a headlamp and I decided I should paint the tree with one of our 1,000,000 candlepower lights.</p>

	<p>We made two exposures this way when Chris saw bright lights at the top of the road by the gate. There are only two major fears photographers have in the woods at night: one is the fear of being mauled or eaten alive by hungry black bears preparing for hibernation, and two is the fear of someone spoiling your 45-minute exposure with a careless wave of their flashlight. The second fear, of course, is much more gripping. The lights proceeded toward us. Knowing that they had passed the locked gate, we could be sure it was a ranger. But what business might a ranger have in that dark place at that hour? Surely we were simply two benign photographers walking the trails and roads as any other visitors might.</p>

	<h2>Touched by a Ranger</h2>

	<p>&#8220;Step into the road where I can see you,&#8221; came the ranger&#8217;s commanding voice. The sound seemed to come from a tall, black void in the wall of pure, blinding whiteness pouring over us from the seven lights on the ranger&#8217;s car. We did as he asked. &#8220;I need you to empty your pockets. Take everything out and put it on the ground and turn your pockets out.&#8221; A strange request; perhaps they check random people to make sure they don&#8217;t have contraband or something. Yes, that&#8217;s it, and this ranger decided that the best place to look for tourist pranksters would be down this <em>gated road</em> in the <em>inky black of night&#8230;</em></p>

	<p>Before I knew it I was standing with my hands behind my head getting thoroughly and deeply <em>frisked</em> by a national park ranger. For those casual readers out there among you, I am not a man who has even once been suspected of anything by the Powers That Be, let alone <em>deeply frisked</em>. A minute later I&#8217;m sitting by a tree with my legs crossed watching the same fate befall my partner. What was to become of us?</p>

	<p>&#8220;Are there any more flashlights here? Do you boys have more flashlights?&#8221;</p>

	<p>&#8220;Yes sir, there is one there by our bags,&#8221; I replied. He fetched it. Turning now to my associate, he poised the question,</p>

	<p>&#8220;Do you what&#8217;s going to happen if I shine this into your eyes?&#8221;</p>

	<p>&#8220;I&#8217;ll be blinded,&#8221; my pal answered.</p>

	<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s right. You&#8217;ll be blinded. Now how do you s&#8217;pose an animal is going to feel when you shine this at them?&#8221;</p>

	<p>Thus the story began to unfold. The ranger explained that &#8220;spotlighting,&#8221; or shining bright lights into the woods and such, is frowned upon. Moreover, such behavior is indicative of <strong>poachers</strong>. He went on to say that using headlamps to walk and shining lights briefly into the woods if an animal might be approaching is OK, but shining one million candlepower flashlights across fields is more like what people do when they&#8217;re searching for some wild game to illegally sneak away with.</p>

	<p>Why anyone would poach animals 500 yards from a ranger station (as we were) is beyond me, and the question of exactly how extraordinary a power trip that ranger was on still remains. Nevertheless, each national park in America is permitted to set their own rules of behavior governing the use of artificial light and the points made by the ranger that night were valid ones.</p>

	<p>Take it from me, you do <em>not</em> want to be rigorously patted down by a ranger in the middle of the night, so be sure to ask the rangers at any park you&#8217;re visiting about applicable regulations. Remember also that you&#8217;re not alone out there. We all have a responsibility to remain mindful of our impact on indigenous wildlife and to respect the park as their home&#8230; Because that&#8217;s what it is.</p><ol class="footnotes"><li id="footnote_0_149" class="footnote">Black bears don&#8217;t want trouble, but they just <em>hate</em> surprises.</li></ol><div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://singleservingphoto.com/2007/10/16/protecting-our-national-parks-one-photographers-story/' addthis:title='Protecting Our National Parks: One Photographer&#8217;s Story '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://singleservingphoto.com/2007/10/16/protecting-our-national-parks-one-photographers-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

